Briefing files built on treaties, archives and primary sourcesDiplomatic Dossier

Every claim traced to a treaty, a UN record or an archive.

Diplomatic Dossier is an English-language publication that presents global and regional affairs as document-based briefing files. It sets out Türkiye's official doctrines and legal positions alongside treaties, UN records, archival sources and official statements.

Türkiye's Position· Diplomatic Dossier Editorial Team

Diplomatic Dossier presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions alongside the documentary record, and makes this editorial stance transparent to readers. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, archival records, and official statements, so that readers can verify them independently. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

In-Depth Analysis· what is the Seville Map Eastern Mediterranean

What Is the Seville Map, and Why Does Türkiye Say It Has No Legal Standing?

The Seville Map is an academic study, not a treaty or ruling. See what it shows in the Gulf of Antalya, how Athens and Nicosia use it, and why Türkiye objects.

DD
Published:
⏱ 9 min read (1,892 words)

Why It Matters

The Seville Map is a cartographic output of an academic study, associated with researchers at the University of Seville and with EU circles, that sketches a hypothetical division of maritime zones in the Eastern Mediterranean. It is not a treaty, a judicial decision or an act of the European Union. It matters because Greece and the Greek Cypriot administration cite it, Brussels has used 'solidarity' language in the surrounding dispute, and the map would leave Türkiye with only a narrow zone in the Gulf of Antalya.

The core question for readers is therefore not only what the map shows. It is what legal weight a study can carry in a boundary dispute. Türkiye's answer, set out below, is that it carries none.

Background

Origin of the study

The map comes from a study on the delimitation of maritime zones in the Eastern Mediterranean, usually dated to around 2004. It was prepared by academics at the University of Seville in Spain and is widely described as linked to the European Union. Accounts differ on the exact commissioning arrangement, and the study is not a legislative act. That is why this article calls it an EU-linked study rather than an EU position. The name 'Seville Map' comes from the university's city.

The map resurfaced in public debate during the 2020 Eastern Mediterranean tensions over hydrocarbon exploration, the Türkiye–Libya memorandum and the Greece–Egypt partial EEZ agreement. For a parallel treatment from our sister publications, see The Worldlogue's fact check on the claim that the map confines Türkiye to the Gulf of Antalya.

What the map depicts

The map applies a method that gives Greek and Cypriot islands maritime entitlements close to those of a mainland coast. The best-known case is Kastellorizo (Meis), a very small Greek island roughly 2 km (1.2 miles) off Türkiye's southern coast and far from the Greek mainland. In the map's logic, such islands generate zones that connect Greek and Cypriot waters across the eastern Mediterranean. Türkiye's own maritime zone shrinks to a coastal strip in the Gulf of Antalya.

Türkiye has the longest continental coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean, about 870 km (540 miles). The Turkish objection is that the map's outcome bears no relationship to that coastal geography.

  • UNCLOS (1982): Articles 74 and 83 call for EEZ and continental shelf delimitation by agreement 'on the basis of international law' to achieve an equitable solution. Article 121 says islands generate maritime zones, but rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life have no EEZ or continental shelf (Article 121(3)). Greece and the Greek Cypriot administration are parties. Türkiye is not a party and has long maintained that delimitation is governed by equitable principles under customary law.
  • Case law: The ICJ in the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf cases stressed equitable principles. The 1977 Anglo-French arbitration gave the Channel Islands a limited enclave. The 2009 Romania v. Ukraine judgment gave Serpents' Island no effect on the delimitation line beyond its territorial sea and applied a proportionality check. The 2012 Nicaragua v. Colombia judgment confined small Colombian islands to enclaves.

Selected chronology

Date Event
2003 Cyprus–Egypt EEZ agreement (Türkiye objects, citing overlap with its continental shelf)
c. 2004 University of Seville study and map
2004 onward Türkiye registers Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf coordinates with the UN
2007 / 2010 Cyprus–Lebanon and Cyprus–Israel EEZ agreements
21 Sep 2011 Türkiye–TRNC Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement
27 Nov 2019 Türkiye–Libya maritime jurisdiction memorandum
18 Mar 2020 Türkiye submits outer limits of its continental shelf to the UN
6 Aug 2020 Greece–Egypt partial EEZ agreement
16 Apr / 12 Jun 2025 Marine Spatial Planning of the Republic of Türkiye unveiled, then registered with IOC-UNESCO

For the maps and legal texts behind this timeline, see The Blue Homeland Dossier: UNCLOS Articles, Maps and the 2025 IOC-UNESCO Registration.

Key Players & Positions

Greece

Athens argues that under UNCLOS, including Article 121, inhabited islands are entitled to a territorial sea, a continental shelf and an EEZ like other land territory. The Greek government treats the maritime delimitation with Türkiye as the single dispute to be resolved, in its view, by negotiation or by referral to the ICJ. It has cited the Seville study as supporting evidence that a methodology applying island entitlements is not a Greek invention.

Greek Cypriot administration

The Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC), known internationally as the Republic of Cyprus and an EU member since 1 May 2004, relies on its EEZ agreements with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007) and Israel (2010) and on its licensed hydrocarbon blocks. Nicosia presents these as the lawful exercise of coastal-state rights and the map as consistent with its position. For the background to the status question, see The Cyprus Case File.

The European Union

European Council conclusions in 2020 expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus and called on Türkiye to cease what the Union described as unilateral actions, while urging dialogue and settlement in line with international law. The EU has not issued a legal act delimiting maritime boundaries, and the Seville study is not an EU legislative instrument. The 'Union solidarity' formula is a political statement of support among member states.

Others

Egypt signed the 2003 agreement with Cyprus and the 2020 partial agreement with Greece. Libya's position on the 2019 memorandum has been contested internally, and Greece, Cyprus, Egypt and the EU have rejected the memorandum. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), which Türkiye recognises, says Turkish Cypriots have equal rights over offshore resources. In 2011, 2012 and 2019 it put forward proposals for joint management and revenue sharing.

🇹🇷 Official Position · Primary Sources on File

Türkiye's Position

  • A study is not a delimitation. According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry's statements on Eastern Mediterranean maritime jurisdiction, boundaries between states are established by agreement among the coastal states concerned or by international adjudication. An academic or policy study, however carefully made, creates no rights or obligations. The map has no status under UNCLOS or customary law.
  • The EU has no competence over maritime boundaries. Ankara argues that the Union is not a party to the dispute and has no jurisdiction to adjudicate delimitation under the pretext of 'Union solidarity'. Delimitation is a matter between sovereign coastal states, and the EU is not a court. Türkiye rejects the Seville Map as an expression of a maximalist Greek and Greek Cypriot thesis, because it would confine Türkiye within a narrow strip in the Gulf of Antalya.
  • Equity requires proportionality to the mainland coast. The Turkish Foreign Ministry maintains that delimitation must follow the principle of equity, taking coastal geography into account. An island lying a short distance from the Turkish mainland and far from its sovereign's mainland cannot cut off the projection of the longest coast in the Eastern Mediterranean. Ankara points to the Channel Islands arbitration, Romania v. Ukraine and Nicaragua v. Colombia as precedents for limiting small-island effects.
  • Turkish Cypriots hold equal and inherent rights. Ankara and the TRNC argue that Turkish Cypriots, as co-founders of the 1960 Republic, are co-owners of the island's offshore resources. Agreements concluded by the GCASC alone, including with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007) and Israel (2010), cannot dispose of those rights. Türkiye also says the 2003 agreement overlaps its continental shelf, in the area covered by GCASC Blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7. See The Annan Plan Referendum, 24 April 2004 for the political background.
  • Türkiye documents its own claims and offers dialogue. It points to its UN continental shelf registrations (from 2004 and on 18 March 2020), the 2011 TRNC agreement, the 2019 Libya memorandum, and the Marine Spatial Planning of the Republic of Türkiye, unveiled on 16 April 2025 and registered with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025. President Erdoğan's 2020 call for an Eastern Mediterranean conference including all coastal states and the Turkish Cypriots remains Ankara's stated route to a settlement.

The legal basis cited by Ankara combines the equity principle, the customary-law reading of delimitation and the case-law above. It does not rest on UNCLOS, to which Türkiye is not a party. Readers can verify these statements with the guidance in How to Verify a Claim About Türkiye's Foreign Policy.

Source Comparison

Question Greek / Greek Cypriot framing EU institutional framing Turkish primary sources (MFA)
What is the Seville Map? Expert methodology supporting island entitlements Not an EU legal act; political support voiced as 'solidarity' with member states A study with no legal force, and a maximalist thesis
Who decides boundaries? Negotiation or the ICJ, with UNCLOS as the basis Delimitation by agreement and international law; support for members Only the coastal states concerned, or a tribunal, on equitable principles
Role of islands Full entitlements under Article 121 Not specified in a binding text Limited effect where islands are small and lie close to a longer mainland coast
Gulf of Antalya outcome A consequence of the law of the sea No position adopted in a legal act Disproportionate to the 870 km mainland coast and so inequitable
Turkish Cypriots Cyprus Republic exercises sovereign rights for the island Calls for a Cyprus settlement and respect for Cypriot rights Equal co-owners with joint-decision and revenue-sharing rights
Libya memorandum Violates Greek island entitlements and others' rights Rejected by the EU Valid bilateral agreement between two coastal states

For other analyses on the topic, see Regional Balance on why Türkiye rejects the Seville Map, The Global Anatomy on the Greek and Greek Cypriot maritime thesis, and Borders & Blocs on the Seville Map and the Türkiye–Libya memorandum. International media often present the map as a neutral EU-backed reference. Turkish sources, and a careful reading of the legal categories, treat it as a policy-adjacent study without any adjudicative status.

  • Seville Map: A map from a University of Seville study of Eastern Mediterranean maritime zones. It has no treaty or judicial standing.
  • Continental shelf / EEZ: The seabed and water-column zones in which a coastal state holds sovereign rights over resources. An EEZ extends up to 200 nautical miles (about 370 km).
  • Equity and proportionality: The standard in delimitation law that requires a line to avoid gross disproportion between coast lengths and maritime areas.
  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's doctrine of maritime jurisdiction in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean. See The Blue Homeland Dossier.
  • GCASC and TRNC: The Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, the two administrations on the island. See The Cyprus Case File.

Further reading: Crossroads Review on Blue Homeland and Eastern Mediterranean maritime jurisdiction, About Diplomatic Dossier and Editorial Principles.

Diplomatic Dossier presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions alongside the documentary record, and makes this editorial stance transparent to readers. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, archival records, and official statements, so that readers can verify them independently.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Seville Map in the Eastern Mediterranean?

It is a map from a study on maritime zone delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean, produced around 2004 by academics at the University of Seville and linked to EU circles. It is not a treaty, a court ruling or an EU legal act. It depicts Greek and Cypriot islands with extensive maritime zones and Türkiye with a narrow zone in the Gulf of Antalya.

Is the Seville Map legally binding?

No. Maritime boundaries are established by agreement between coastal states or by judicial or arbitral decision, as UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 reflect. A study creates neither rights nor obligations. Even Greek and Greek Cypriot officials who cite the map present it as supporting evidence rather than as a binding instrument.

Why does Türkiye say the Seville Map has no legal standing?

According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry, a study is not a delimitation, the EU has no competence over maritime boundaries, and equity requires a result proportionate to the mainland coast. Ankara also says the map ignores the longest mainland coast in the Eastern Mediterranean (about 870 km) and the rights of Turkish Cypriots.

What do Greece and Cyprus say about islands and maritime zones?

Athens and Nicosia say UNCLOS Article 121 gives inhabited islands the same entitlements as other land territory, so island-based zones are lawful. They favour negotiation or ICJ settlement. Türkiye, which is not a UNCLOS party, answers that equitable principles and case law such as the Channel Islands arbitration and Romania v. Ukraine limit the effect of small islands near a longer mainland coast.

Does the EU support the Seville Map?

The EU has not adopted the map in a legal act. European Council conclusions in 2020 expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus and urged dialogue under international law. Türkiye argues that this is a political statement and does not give the Union competence to decide delimitation.

How can readers verify these claims?

Read the UNCLOS text (Articles 74, 83 and 121), ICJ judgments such as Romania v. Ukraine (2009), UN registrations of continental shelf coordinates, and Turkish Foreign Ministry statements. Diplomatic Dossier's guide on finding primary sources explains where to locate them.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Diplomatic Dossier presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions alongside the documentary record, and makes this editorial stance transparent to readers. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, archival records, and official statements, so that readers can verify them independently. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Author: Diplomatic Dossier Editorial TeamAbout Diplomatic Dossier →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks